There’s no doubt that the future of media, and T.V. in particular, will be on the web and thus, your computer, iPod, , iPad, Crunchpad, hell maybe someday even your wristwatch. As such, being the tech and media addict I am, I’m about to share something with you that will change your life, seriously. Now, most of us have heard of Hulu, the one-stop shop for all your NBC media needs. Perhaps you’ve even heard of the Hulu desktop app. which, all things considered, is actually pretty good. If your even more geeky and media addicted you may have heard of Boxee which maintains it is “the best way to enjoy entertainment from the Internet and computer on your TV.” Well Boxee, I respectfully disagree. My choice? Zinc.Tv
I promised myself I wouldn’t even mention Apple’s recently released iPad, not even mention it, mainly because I was done with the iPad before Steve Jobs could finish the entire keynote last Wednesday. Sigh, but here I am about to eat my words and conceit (sort of) defeat. Ultimately that reason is the long developed and anticipated introduction of HTML5, the new and improved HTML.
Basically, this post is in regards to a heated tweet battle me and my friend Blake had on the day of the unveiling of the iPad. I contended that one major shortcoming of the iPad, along with most Apple peripherals like the iPhone and iTouch, was the lacking of Adobe Flash. Now if you don’t know already, Adobe Flash has been until now the internet’s saving grace when it came to multimedia extensions inline on web pages. It is (was?) the very backbone of multimedia consumption through browsers. It’s also can be really buggy, a huge CPU hog, and limits user experience based on browser, computer specs, and the site that hosts the content. Unfortunately, it has also spawned a million annoying useless ads that Google’s recently acquired company Double Click advertising has released like locust, but that’s a rant for another day. My friend Blake was quick to retort that while the lack of Flash on the iPad, much like the lack of Flash on the iPhone for the past like 5 years, may seem dehabilitating and much more than annoying, it was at end inconsequential as the rise of HTML5 begins.
After the entire music industry and the blogosphere at large got punked last week (no, Ashton wasn’t actually involved, thank God!) by a fake Justice track which supposedly ‘leaked’ entitled “Beginning of The End”, you’d think everyone would be on alert level orange and a bit more cautious about what they take as face value. Apparently, that’s not the case. Every now and then though, as much of a slimy PR stunt as it is, the world discovers great music this way. One of the prime examples that comes to mind is the fake release of Girl Talk’s 2008 mixtape (album?) called Feed The Animals which, in similar fashion to the recent Justice punking, ‘leaked’ early by an artist named Speaky. The sad (or amazing) thing is that his fake mixtape of Girl Talk’s Feed The Animals was actually quite good; there were definitly times where I would find myself listening to the fake over the original. If you want something that will really bake your noodle though, consider this: what really is the original anyways? Was Girl Talk’s work in any sense ‘original’ as an artist that purely takes samples of other songs and interweaves them with no original interjection of his own? This sort of reminds me of Jean Baudrillard’s Simulacra and Simulation, a seminal work on postermodernism, and the his idea of the ‘hyper real’ in regards to simulacrum.
Last December Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt was quoted regarding their new privacy policy which, consequently, doesn’t really include much privacy at all. Schmidt was quoted saying “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place. If you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines — including Google — do retain this information for some time and it’s important, for example, that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act and it is possible that all that information could be made available to the authorities.” For some time? Try 180 days. Scary stuff, to say the least. Even Mozilla’s Director of Community Development was encouraging users to switch to Bing. And yes, Bing’s privacy policy is better than Google’s at this point. That got me thinking, why not Bing?
Believe it or not Microsoft has hit a huge home run with its new search engine “Bing!”. I have to say I was pretty skeptical at first about trying it, I mean after all I can’t remember a time where those rainbow o’s in Goooogle weren’t the first thing to greet me when I power up my ThinkPad. Hell, they’re even sort of, um well, comforting in a weird way. Well, I guess it’s not that weird when you consider how much time the average American teen spends on the internet a week: 30, count them 3-0, hours. Anyways, after years of letting Google’s search engine dominate my internet experience I thought I’d give Bing a try. So far, I really like it. Don’t worry though Google, I haven’t abandoned you yet, but there are a few new tricks Bing’s search engine could teach you. Sergey and Larry, you listening? need more? read on…

















